Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 4:47 pm
dry cereal wrote:hahahaa, well played
The Magic Librarities Forum
https://www.magiclibrarities.net/forum/
https://www.magiclibrarities.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=9210
dry cereal wrote:hahahaa, well played
NeRo wrote:Hey guys, nice to see that the thread became a sticky. I have been abroad (I am in Yerevan right now) for nearly a month now and will be back home at the end of September. I do not mind other people who have the rights editing the opening post while I am gone or even when I am back.
@mmgun
the card is not in any prepacked deck so that you can be sure that it is a regular sheet?
@dragsamou
classification is generally a bit tricky but I tried my best and I am grateful for any input.
mmgun wrote:It was just copy and paste from the auction Site. Mirrodin block precons do not contain this card. And its in portuguese, so it should come from a sheet.NeRo wrote: @mmgun
the card is not in any prepacked deck so that you can be sure that it is a regular sheet?
dragsamou wrote:Hi NeroNeRo wrote: @dragsamou
classification is generally a bit tricky but I tried my best and I am grateful for any input.
I'm not a Misprint Specialist, even if I own a lil bit of each, but with the help of Members into it, I'm sure we will find a Common name for all of them.
gzeiger wrote:I have seen Revised common with back vertically miscut (I have Disenchant). I also have a Dark uncommon with the same error (Season of the Witch).
Surely the Pokemon and Harry Potter backs can be counted as unique?
fratrus2 wrote:i should make better pics (the land set is now bigger, there were around 5 cards missing)
http://fratrus.free.fr/magic/misprint/graveborn.jpg
NeRo wrote:I saw that and I am pretty sure it is from that sheet:
eng rare urza's destiny / horizontally shifted
There was a discussion on this board regarding why some card from that sheet did not show the line with the collectors number while others did.
Magic61983 wrote:I missed the Replenish a few years back was very disappointing.
berkumps wrote:Wouldn't this be vertically shifted?NeRo wrote:eng rare urza's destiny / horizontally shifted .
Of course, I will add those, and more, but since I'm the one that needs to take care of that topic now, give me a bit of timeouallada wrote:Perhaps we can add these:
- known albino sets, especially important as it can be a checklist against which any "albino" card can be held accountable to reduce chances of fake albinos
- Faded ink (4th ed, spanish MM etc)
- Pre-con MM with upside down + miscut back
- False Prophet promo with shifted text
- english foil uncommon MM cards with shifted foiling
- english foil common UD cards with shifted foiling
There are a bunch of others which can be added.