I respectfully disagree, Hans. I think this ilk of card is just a reiteration of a very old "promotion strategy" done by the company. These cards differ in no significant way from the Serra or the APAC/EURO lands or any other offering by the company that is based entirely on a quantity purchase from a dealer (yes, WotC was a dealer at one time).Mister Foilcard wrote:Exactly, that's correct. Therefore the Angel has nothing to do with the box promo program. This new program is available worldwide. Both things are different programs.
When thinking of why a promo card exists the logic is:
Primary: Promote Magic: The Gathering [read: make money--bottom line]
How?
Encourage people to play: All the pro/casual event cards. Arena, FNM, Pro-tour, ad infinitum, ad nausiam
Encourage quantity sales: buy a box (Serra, APAC/EURO, these cards, buy old boosters (Wall-Mart), box-top cads (8th/9th ed 4x6).
Encourage people to help do the above: Judge gift, Holiday promos
Encourage purchase of other company products or just raise market awareness: media inserts, Convention cards.
Encourage collecting: all the above---LOL
We must remember that product promotion is just a marketing strategy and all promo cards are just a sub-set of promotion in general.
In looking at the overall history of company promos there is no difference between these cards and anything previously used to cause the same result--quantity buying.
I would like to see the entire indexing revamped along these lines (as I have organized my own collection) as I see no difference in the "token" Arena cards and the other Arena cards--same reason--same promotion. The new token cards are really promo cards--as we see by reading the backs and are part of their respective sets.
The reason for an index is to be able to find something and I am mature enough (ok no comments) to realize that considering the diverse cultural background of our collecting population that is no easy request.
But, I do think that having 4 or 5 inclusive divisions, organized along the above lines would be a real help to new users of the board. Most of the present sections would remain exactly the same and should simply be arranged chronologically within one of the above divisions.
Obviously a card name index would be a tremendous asset to the board.
In any case! NONE of this is a negative comment on the present board but rather an observation based on the preference of this collector. This board has been absolutely essential to my collection and I have nothing but the highest reguards for each of you that has worked so hard on it.