Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 7:10 am
Hey Brian,
BGS has been grading Magic cards since at least early 2005, if not before. I'm not sure when PSA started, but it was right around 2000. That being said, by the beginning of 2005 they had graded very few cards - in fact I had the #1 Arabian set and the #2 Alpha, Beta, and Unlimited sets, with only 228 cards total between them. There were only about 10 sets listed in all, and none of them were very big. Of those sets only 1 is still around (besides mine), and it has changed hands.
Based on this I really can't agree with your notion that the reason for PSA's dominance is it's head start in the grading of MtG cards. As most of the grading of cards occurred once both companies were grading, collectors could have gone either way, based on personal preference. While PSA did get a jump on Beckett, I don't think it was enough of one to explain why collectors seem to prefer PSA over BGS.
Just my $.02 worth.
Take it easy,
Jared
BGS has been grading Magic cards since at least early 2005, if not before. I'm not sure when PSA started, but it was right around 2000. That being said, by the beginning of 2005 they had graded very few cards - in fact I had the #1 Arabian set and the #2 Alpha, Beta, and Unlimited sets, with only 228 cards total between them. There were only about 10 sets listed in all, and none of them were very big. Of those sets only 1 is still around (besides mine), and it has changed hands.
Based on this I really can't agree with your notion that the reason for PSA's dominance is it's head start in the grading of MtG cards. As most of the grading of cards occurred once both companies were grading, collectors could have gone either way, based on personal preference. While PSA did get a jump on Beckett, I don't think it was enough of one to explain why collectors seem to prefer PSA over BGS.
Just my $.02 worth.
Take it easy,
Jared